Wednesday, January 30, 2019

The Social Institution Of Marriage In Jane Austen’s Society Essay examp

The Social Institution Of uniting In Jane Austens Society In the following essay I am going to closely examine the proposals of jointure Elizabeth by her full cousin Mr Collins, and aristocrat Mr Darcy.I am also going to compare and line of work the events of each proposal.In Jane Austens lifetime a womens side in society came first offfrom her parents and secondly when she married. Jane Austen shows themarked differences in distinguish frequently, as this was a major feature ofeveryday life in the 19th century. Men were seen as being far superiorto women as they were able to work and thus earn a small, and in lofty law of naturesuits a large fortune. Pride and Prejudice in some slipway mirrors JaneAustens own life, as her heart was broken at a tender age. JaneAusten gave her undying love to her hero Tom Lefroy, however the jeerproved in congruous as neither Jane or Tom had a sufficient income toallow them to live as man and wife. At only twenty Jane Austens reallove had c ome and gone and she never went on to love anyone else.Pride and Prejudice portrays the struggle for women to find compatiblemen, that not only satisfied their own need for love and adoration, moreover also suitors that meet their families best interests.In chapter nineteen it becomes clear to the proofreader that Mr Collins isinterested in Mrs Bennets daughters. He firstly questions theavailability of Jane but is told that she is soon to be engaged to MrBingley. After this come in back Mr Collins inquires about Elizabeth (thesecond eldest daughter of Mrs Bennet.) may I hope madam, for yourinterest with your fair daughter Elizabeth, when I crave for thehonour of a private audience with her in the course of this morning.Elizabeth move to inte... ...)within a family could have serious consequences on daughters and theireligibility for marriage. Many would keep spinsters or they wouldmarry outside their usual social circle. It was not unusual forcouples to become engaged in th eir late teens (with the lifeexpectancy at this time of approximately forty years it is perhaps not move that couples married young). Today many couples aremarrying in their thirties and marriage is not as fashionable orsocially vital. In the Bennets case as in that respect was no son and heirthere was the law of entailment whereby property was left to a malerelative. Therefore there was a real pressure for a daughter to marrythe successor so that property and wealth could remain within thefamily. Of course laws the likes of this do not generally exist today, andmarriages are a heart of love rather than a business proposition.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.